Dustin Inman Society

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Nick Sandmann’s Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against SPLC

Article title: 
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Nick Sandmann’s Attorney Joins Lawsuit Against SPLC
Article subtitle: 
Article author: 
Tyler O'Neil
Article publisher: 
The Daily Signal
Article date: 
Mon, 07/10/2023
Article expiration date: 
Sun, 09/10/2023
Article importance: 
High
Article body: 

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Todd McMurtry, the lawyer who secured settlements from CNN, NBC Universal, and The Washington Post on behalf of Covington Catholic High School teen Nick Sandmann, has joined the legal team for D.A. King and the Dustin Inman Society, who are suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for defamation.

“We’re proud of the willingness of both Liberty Counsel and Todd McMurtry in agreeing to represent us in defense of our good name and reputation from the ridiculous charges of the hatemongering Southern Poverty Law Center,” King, an anti-illegal immigration activist whose organization the SPLC branded an “anti-immigrant hate group,” told The Daily Signal in a phone interview Monday. “We’re also proud of Mr. McMurtry’s experience and success in defamation law.”

“I hope we are successful in court and that no violent, hate-filled supporter of the SPLC finds us first,” the plaintiff added. King was referring to a 2012 incident in which a now-convicted terrorist targeted the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., for a mass shooting, relying on the SPLC’s inclusion of the group on its “hate map” of organizations the left-wing SPLC considers bigoted or hateful in some way.

I wrote in my book “Making Hate Pay,” the SPLC routinely brands mainstream conservative and Christian organizations “hate groups,” putting them on a map with chapters of the Ku Klux Klan. Amid a racial discrimination and sexual harassment scandal in 2019, the SPLC fired its cofounder and a former employee came forward, calling the “hate” accusations a “highly profitable scam.”

McMurtry and the Christian law firm Liberty Counsel joined with King’s current lawyer, James McKoon, on Monday. McKoon, of the McKoon and Gamble law firm in Phenix City, Alabama, initially filed the lawsuit.

“The SPLC’s stated motivation is to ‘destroy’ groups with which it disagrees, and it accomplishes this objective by falsely labeling nonviolent organizations as ‘hate groups,'” Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, said in a statement Monday. “This label is false and those who rely upon it must stop.”

The SPLC has accused Liberty Counsel of being an “anti-LGBTQ hate group,” an accusation Liberty Counsel disputes. Liberty Counsel claims SPLC attacks it due to its Christian faith and opposition to same-sex marriage. In 2007, former SPLC spokesman Mark Potok said, “Our aim in life is to destroy these groups, completely destroy them.”

Legacy media outlets attacked Sandmann in 2019 when a video of him near the Lincoln Memorial while wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat after the annual March for Life went viral. McMurtry represented Sandmann in multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuits against legacy media outlets, securing undisclosed settlements from CNN, NBC Universal, and The Washington Post. A federal judge dismissed Sandmann’s other defamation lawsuits in July 2022.

King’s lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center made it to the discovery process earlier this year. Other conservative groups have sued the SPLC for defamation, but King’s succeeded because King showed that the SPLC had reason to doubt the truth of its claim that his organization, the Dustin Inman Society, was an “anti-immigrant hate group.” In fact, the SPLC had explicitly stated that the society was not a “hate group” in 2011, but it reversed course in 2018, right after registering a lobbyist to oppose a bill the society supported.

The lawsuit cites an SPLC definition for “anti-immigrant hate group” that dates back to 2020, which no longer appears on the SPLC website—although the center appears not to have adopted a new definition:

Anti-immigrant hate groups are the most extreme of the hundreds of nativist groups that have proliferated since the late 1990s, when anti-immigration xenophobia began to rise to levels not seen in the United States since the 1920s. Most white hate groups are also anti-immigrant, but anti-immigrant hate groups single out that population with dehumanizing and demeaning rhetoric. Although many groups legitimately criticize American immigration policies, anti-immigrant hate groups go much further by pushing racist propaganda and ideas about non-white immigrants.  

Marietta immigration activist suing SPLC over 'hate group' designation

Article title: 
Marietta immigration activist suing SPLC over 'hate group' designation
Article subtitle: 
Article author: 
Hunter Riggall
Article publisher: 
Marietta Daily Journal
Article date: 
Thu, 04/27/2023
Article expiration date: 
Sat, 09/30/2023
Article importance: 
High
Article body: 

Apr. 27—A federal judge has ruled that a defamation suit filed by a Marietta-based immigration activist against the Southern Poverty Law Center can proceed.

D.A. King, the founder and leader of the Dustin Inman Society, is suing the Southern Poverty Law Center over its designation of his organization as an "anti-immigrant hate group."

The Dustin Inman Society advocates for tougher enforcement of immigration laws and on its website states that it "believe(s) the fundamental duty of the federal government is to enforce federal laws, to secure American borders and protect the American people from unauthorized and uninspected border crossings."

The group is named for Dustin Inman, a Georgia teenager killed in a car crash — law enforcement said the crash was caused by an immigrant living in the country illegally.

The group says it does not oppose legal immigration and that its board includes legal immigrants.

The SPLC, meanwhile, alleges on its website that the Dustin Inman Society "poses as an organization concerned about immigration issues, yet focuses on vilifying all immigrants."

According to the suit, the SPLC first designated the Dustin Inman Society as a hate group in 2018. In 2011, an SPLC representative told the Associated Press they had not labeled it a hate group since its tactics have "generally not been to get up in the face of actual immigrants and threaten them," and has rather been "working on ... legislation through the political process."

King and his group charge that the SPLC added the hate group designation to destroy his group's reputation, foil their attempts to influence legislation and increase SPLC fundraising. He points to the timing of the designation, around the same time the Georgia General Assembly was considering immigration enforcement legislation.

The Dustin Inman Society also argues that its activities did not substantively change between 2011 and 2018.

The Montgomery-based SPLC asked Judge Keith Watkins of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama to dismiss the suit, arguing, among other things, that its hate group designation is an opinion protected under the First Amendment.

Watkins, an appointee of President George W. Bush, disagreed.

"The allegations about SPLC's portrayal of its elite status in tracking and investigating hate groups and its specialized knowledge make it plausible that a reasonable reader would discern that, when SPLC designates a group an 'anti-immigrant hate group," the designation is factually based after extensive investigation," Watkins wrote.

Subscribe to RSS - Dustin Inman Society