Black journalists untroubled by anti-Black immigration policy

There has never been a question that Black Americans are hurt the most by mass immigration, but Black members of the media, knowing this, arrogantly continue their years-long policy of not making waves when it comes to the continuing flood of foreign workers that the lawless "President" Obama reportedly is poised to intensify by the end of this year.

To be sure, you'll run across the occasional columns by Black journalists bemoaning the lousy economic environment in which millions of Blacks have lived for decades, but don't expect them to hold accountable a federal government that supports an immigration policy rigged to benefit the few at the expense of the many.

No, not a word from the likes of Leonard Pitts Jr., Clarence Page and Cynthia Tucker, all of whom have won Pulitzer Prizes. Let's take a quick look at why these three took home this most coveted journalism award:

Tucker: "For her courageous, clear-headed columns that evince a strong sense of morality and persuasive knowledge of the community."

Page: "For his provocative columns on local and national affairs."

Pitts: "For his fresh, vibrant columns that spoke, with both passion and compassion, to ordinary people on often divisive issues."

Are we to believe that among the nation's Black journalists, especially these three, there is no outrage over the government's politically motivated campaign to push the nation's second largest minority group back to the back of the political, economic and social bus?

Apparently not.

It's too soon to tell whether anybody in the media, regardless of their race or ethnic background, will give notice to the Oct. 27 letter to "President" Obama written by Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow, in which he states:

“Granting work authorization to millions of illegal immigrants will devastate the black community, which is already struggling in the wake of the recession that began in 2007 and the subsequent years of malaise.”

Kirsanow continues: "Illegal immigration has a disparate impact on African-American men, because these men are disproportionately represented in the low-skilled labor force."

Journalists always have been champions of the underdog, "giving a voice to those who have no voice," etc., etc., but why are those here illegally always treated exclusively as having no voice?

One of the arguments heard from amnesty supporters in and out of Congress is that legalization of 11 million illegal aliens is a must lest "we create a permanent underclass of people."

Looking at the outrageous unemployment and poverty rates of both Blacks and Hispanic-Americans, it's pretty obvious that this underclass already exists and will remain that way if Obama is allowed to get awaywith his executive amnesty for the millions of job thieves in our midst.

I once asked a long-time immigration restrictionist why the media, which aggressively worked on behalf of Blacks during their battle to achieve full civil rights, have remained silent about immigration's impact on them.

"C'mon, Dave," she said, "Blacks are so 20th century."

Apparently, members of the Black media and the Oval Office Occupant agree.